DISCUSSION
In general, PICA aneurysms make up approximately 0.5–3% of all cerebral aneurysms, while aneurysms distal to the VA-PICA bifurcation make up 0.2% [
11]. Extracranial PICA aneurysms represent an even rarer type of lesion related to anatomical variations in the origin and course of the artery. The PICA usually originates from the intradural, intracranial V4-segment of the VA, but variations of PICA anatomy are common. Intradural PICA origin below the foramen magnum occur in 17–18% [
12] of cases and caudal PICA loops below the foramen magnum occur in 35% [
13] of cases. Therefore, extracranial PICA aneurysms can develop proximally at a low-lying intradural VA-PICA bifurcation or distally on a caudal PICA loop [
1].
The extradural PICA origin at the C1- or C2-levels represents an anatomical variant observed in 1.3% of normal subjects on CTA [
14]. The anomaly is related to the embryonal lateral spinal artery (LSA) [
5]. The LSA corresponds to the posterolateral arterial axis of the upper cervical spinal cord and runs between the posterior rootlets C1–C4 and the dentate ligaments. It anastomoses with small PICA branches at the restiform body and with segmental branches from the vertebral and occipital arteries. Caudally, the LSA terminates in the posterolateral arterial axis of the spinal cord at the C4- or C5-levels. An extradural PICA origin from the VA is thought to develop when a segmental transdural branch to the LSA becomes prominent and establishes a connection to the PICA [
5]. Furthermore, a PICA with extradural C2-origin may also develop from the posterior spinal artery according to Siclari et al. [
6].
Microsurgical studies of cadaveric specimens with the PICA origin at the C1-level have previously been performed [
2,
15], while the anatomy of the C2-origin has been demonstrated on imaging [
5]. A PICA with an extradural C1-origin originates approximately 10 mm proximal to the dura and parallels the VA until both arteries perforate the dura together [
2]. No muscular branches arise from this artery [
2,
15].
The PICA with extradural C2-origin originates from the vertical part of the V3-segment located between the C1 and C2 transverse processes (
Fig. 2). The extradural part of the artery initially courses posteriorly around the lateral mass of the C1 where a muscular branch often arises [
7,
8]. It then enters the spinal canal at the C1–2 intervertebral space coursing medially below the posterior arch of C1. A slight tapering or caliber change of the artery may be visible on DSA images where the artery perforates the dura. The initial intradural segment is usually tortuous, after which the artery ascends as a vertical segment. The artery has a cranial loop after passing the foramen magnum, but often there is no caudal loop. A small intradural anastomotic vessel between the VA and PICA with extradural C2-origin may be found, which was seen in our patient.
Six patients with an aneurysm associated with an extradural PICA origin at the C2-level have previously been reported in the literature (
Table 1) [
3,
4,
7-
10]. All patients presented with aneurysm rupture associated with SAH, intraventricular hemorrhage, and hydrocephalus. Five patients had extracranial aneurysms; 4 of them were located at the level of dural penetration [
3,
4,
7,
9]. One patient with extradural C2-origin of both PICAs had bilateral aneurysms located at the ascending vertical PICA-segment—1 just below and the other at the level of the foramen magnum [
8]. PICA aneurysms are usually amendable to surgical treatment due to their location dorsal to the medulla. In 4 patients with extracranial aneurysms, clipping was performed after variable combinations of suboccipital craniectomies and laminectomies at the C1- and C2-levels [
4,
7-
9]. One patient harbored an intracranial aneurysm, which was treated by a transcondylar approach providing adequate visualization of the aneurysm located anterolateral to the medulla [
10]. Four out of 5 patients undergoing surgery had follow-up DSAs showing complete aneurysm occlusion [
4,
8-
10] and documentation of PICA patency in 3 cases [
4,
8,
10]. There were no technical complications, and surgical treatment resulted in good or excellent outcomes in all patients. The patient reported by Tanaka et al. [
9] developed aphasia and right hemiparesis before undergoing surgery due to a left parietal infarct that was thought to be caused by vasospasms.
Endovascular coil occlusion of an aneurysm arising from a PICA with extradural C2-origin was first reported by Abe et al. [
3]. Parent artery occlusion with microcoils was performed following an asymptomatic balloon test occlusion with normal auditory brain stem monitoring. The patient showed no new symptoms after the procedure and the distal PICA territory was supplied by collaterals.
While in our case, the distal PICA territory appeared to have sufficient collateral flow, selective aneurysm occlusion (SAO) was nevertheless preferred to minimize the risk of a brain stem or cerebellar ischemia. Slight under-packing of the aneurysm with coils was considered reasonable. This strategy proved effective as complete occlusion with preserved PICA flow was confirmed after 3 months.
It has been proposed that a PICA with an extradural origin supplies a ‘less eloquent’ vascular territory because the perforators to the anterolateral medulla normally supplied by the PICA are taken over by the VA instead [
16]. PICAs with extradural origins still supply the olive and the lateral and posterior medulla [
2,
15]. Occlusion of a PICA with extradural origin may not necessarily cause a lateral medullary infarct and the distal PICA territory may even be supplied by anterior inferior cerebellar artery anastomoses, which potentially makes its sacrifice feasible [
3]. However, Won et al. [
17] 2019 recently reported a patient presenting with sixth nerve palsy and diplopia after C1-2 fusion who developed a PICA infarct due to vascular injury of a PICA with an extradural C2-origin. Therefore, in our opinion, SAO, if technically feasible, should be preferred over vessel sacrifice. In cases with difficult access anatomy, triaxial techniques can help overcome tortuous vessel segments. If parent vessel occlusion is performed, a too proximal PICA occlusion should be avoided due to the risk of retrograde filling of the aneurysm through collaterals.
In conclusion, endovascular treatment of aneurysms arising from a PICA with an extradural C2-origin is feasible and can be accomplished either by SAO or sacrifice of the parent vessel. The former should be performed whenever possible to minimize the risk of ischemia, especially in patients with insufficient anastomoses to the distal PICA territory. Endovascular techniques may be particularly useful in patients with favorable anatomy and should be considered in patients who either have contraindications or are reluctant to undergo surgical treatment. Triaxial catheter techniques are recommended. Finally, in patients with SAH and intraventricular hemorrhage in the fourth ventricle, the search for a bleeding source using CTA and DSA should include the upper cervical spine at least down to the C2-level.