Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 87 Warning: chmod() expects exactly 2 parameters, 3 given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 88 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/neurointervention/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2026-02.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Technical Feasibility and Efficacy of Flow-Guided Microcatheter Delivery of i-ED Coils for Parent Artery Occlusion in Posterior Fossa Peripheral Aneurysms
Neurointervention Search

CLOSE


Neurointervention > Volume 20(3); 2025 > Article
Takahashi, Matsushige, Hosogai, Oku, and Horie: Technical Feasibility and Efficacy of Flow-Guided Microcatheter Delivery of i-ED Coils for Parent Artery Occlusion in Posterior Fossa Peripheral Aneurysms

Abstract

Peripheral aneurysms in the posterior circulation are rare vascular pathologies and their treatment remains challenging. Microsurgical procedures for these aneurysms are complex, lengthy, and highly invasive. Endovascular parent artery occlusion could be considered as an alternative treatment of choice; however, it is inherently challenging due to the small vessel caliber and fine manipulation required. Small bore flow-guided microcatheters (1.5 Fr) with high peripheral accessibility are currently available, whereas compatible coils remain limited. The brand-new i-ED coils can be compatible with these microcatheters. We herein present our patient series of peripheral aneurysms in the posterior fossa that were treated endovascularly, and discuss key technical tips and potential pitfalls.

INTRODUCTION

A peripheral aneurysm in the posterior circulation is a rare pathology, and treatment strategies rely on institutional experience. Microsurgical procedures achieve definitive treatment with or without the reconstruction of blood flow using a bypass combination, such as occipital artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) or PICA-PICA anastomosis [1-3]. These procedures are potentially complex, lengthy, and invasive [4-7]. Difficulties are also associated with the endovascular treatment of these distal lesions, such as the limited number of devices capable of navigating small-caliber peripheral and tortuous vessels and the meticulous manipulation required. Flow-guided microcatheter with high peripheral accessibility is now being employed with the advent of coils that may be used with these microcatheters [4,8,9]. We herein present our patient series of peripheral aneurysms in the posterior fossa that were treated endovascularly, and discuss key technical tips and potential pitfalls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Description

Between 2017 and 2024, 4 ruptured peripheral posterior fossa aneurysms (3 in the PICA and 1 in the anterior inferior cerebellar artery [AICA]) were treated by endovascular parent artery occlusion (PAO). Patient demographics, aneurysm locations, aneurysm sizes, parent artery diameters, and microcatheters are summarized in Table 1. No patient showed clinical signs of systemic infection. All aneurysms were categorized as either dissecting or hemodynamic related aneurysms. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. A 6 Fr or 7 Fr guiding catheter was used either via the trans-femoral or brachial approach. After evaluating the collaterals on 3-dimensionally (3D) reconstructed cross-sections of digital subtraction angiography scans or high-resolution cone beam computed tomography, all patients underwent PAO. TACTICS (Technocrat) as a distal access catheter (DAC) was navigated to the parent artery of the ruptured aneurysm. The specific flow-guided microcatheters were the Carry Slim Leon Selective (UTM) or the DeFrictor Bull 1.5 Fr, 165 cm (Medico’s Hirata). The Carry Slim Leon selective series included 2.4 Fr, 145 cm and 1.5 Fr, 165 cm (at the tip) microcatheters, which enabled the coaxial system. An ASAHI CHIKAI X 010 (Asahi Intecc) micro-guidewire was used for all procedures. Coil embolization for PAO was achieved thereafter using i-ED coils Complex Silkysoft (Kaneka) using an electronic detachable coil system. We assessed procedural complications, the presence or absence of new cerebral infarction on postoperative MRI, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6-months outpatient follow-up.

RESULTS

All 4 patients successfully underwent PAO and progressed without re-rupture or recurrence of the culprit aneurysm, with a mRS score of 0 in 2 patients. One patient recovered to mRS 2 because of cerebellar infarction in the PICA cortical territory. The remaining patient was disabled due to initial brain damage, but did not have procedure-related brain infarction. The Carry Slim Leon selective was used in 1 patient, whereas the DeFrictor Bull was used in 3. The average number of i-ED Silkysoft coils to complete PAO was 6 (range, 5–7).

Illustrative Cases

Case 2

An adult patient with chronic basilar artery occlusion presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebellar hemorrhage due to the rupture of a peripheral aneurysm in the AICA (Fig. 1A, E). The aneurysm had developed presumably due to hemodynamic forces. Since collateral circulation from the PICA and the superior cerebellar artery and anterior circulation via the posterior communicating artery were sufficient, we performed PAO of the underlying diseased vessel involving the ruptured aneurysm (Fig. 1BD). Using the Carry Slim Leon Selective 2.4 Fr as a DAC, the Carry Slim Leon 1.5 Fr successfully reached the proximal portion of the AICA aneurysm (Fig. 1F) and PAO was performed using 6 i-ED coils (Fig. 1G). Post-procedural angiography did not show any residual aneurysm, and no new ischemic lesion was observed (Fig. 1H, I). The procedure in this case is shown in Supplementary Video 1. The unruptured distal PICA aneurysm was microsurgically clipped 2 months after treatment because no collateral was expected.

Case 3

An adult patient presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage originating from a ruptured aneurysm in the left PICA telovelotonsillar portion (Fig. 2A). The left AICA was clearly visualized in the periphery, and a collateral pathway to the PICA was expected (Fig. 2B). Due to the acute angle between the left vertebral artery (VA) and PICA, the microcatheter was navigated into the diseased left PICA via the right VA beyond the vertebrobasilar junction (VBJ). A 6 Fr guiding catheter was advanced into the right VA, and a 1.5 Fr microcatheter, DeFrictor Bull, was navigated to the left PICA using TACTICS as a DAC. Since the microcatheter was unable to reach the aneurysm itself, PAO was performed proximally to the aneurysm (Fig. 2C). The i-ED coil, featuring a flexible delivery wire, allowed for stable deployment without kickback, even when navigated through the VBJ or severe vessel tortuosity. Seven i-ED coils were deployed, resulting in successful occlusion (Fig. 2D). Angiography after PAO showed collateral circulation from the left AICA to the PICA perfusion territory (Fig. 2E). No new ischemic lesion was observed (Fig. 2F). The procedure in this case is shown in Supplementary Video 2.

DISCUSSION

An optimal treatment strategy for peripheral aneurysms in the posterior fossa has not yet been established. A combination of microsurgical clipping and bypass procedures is the treatment of choice. Due to well-developed leptomeningeal anastomoses in cerebellar arteries, many cases may tolerate PAO if an alternative blood supply is present [4,7,10,11]. Given the vital brainstem perforators originating from its anterior medullary to tonsillomedullary segments, occlusion of the PICA in these region carries a high risk of fatal ischemic injury [4,10]. The coil should be placed as close as possible to the aneurysm neck, and the length of the occlusion should be minimized to secure adjacent perforating arteries or cortical branches. Conventional microcatheters for coiling are often large in diameter and lack flexibility for peripheral navigation. Therefore, achieving distal access beyond peripheral tortuosity is substantial. Super-small bore and flexible microcatheters, such as the Marathon 1.5 Fr, 165 cm (Medtronic) and the 2 which were presented in this technical presentation, designed for liquid embolization, offer superior distal navigability compared to standard coiling catheters, making them more suitable for treating peripheral posterior fossa aneurysms [4]. Furthermore, the use of a small-bore DAC, such as TACTICS, improves the stability of microcatheters [12]. The emergence of super-small and flexible microcatheters, like the DeFrictor Bull and Carry Slim Leon, which are compatible with small-bore DACs like TACTICS, has further facilitated access to more distal lesions. The Carry Slim Leon with its 2.4 Fr outer diameter and 1.5 Fr inner lumen, allows for a sophisticated quadplex coaxial system when used with a 3.4 Fr DAC, providing improved maneuverability and accessibility to challenging distal targets.
Sacrificing the parent artery for ruptured peripheral intracranial aneurysms is an established concept in neurovascular intervention [5-7,11,13]. Currently, n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate (NBCA) is commonly used as an embolic agent in these microcatheters. However, its use carries significant risks, including procedural complications such as unexpected ischemic complications in the territory of perforating arteries or distal critical collaterals. In contrast, coil embolization offers the potential for more controlled, length-specific embolization, theoretically preserving collateral circulation. A significant current limitation, however, is the lack of commercially available detachable coils compatible with such small-bore flow-directed microcatheters. Although it remains off-label use, the i-ED coils have unique flexibility and detachment system, providing compatibility with flow-guided microcatheters such as the Marathon [4,8,9]. Moreover, the low profile of i-ED Complex Silkysoft coils allows for insertion into flow-guided microcatheters with lumens as small as 0.012–0.014 inches. In vitro demonstration is presented in Supplementary Video 3. As presented in our series, the i-ED coils were successfully inserted without issues even in tortuous anatomical configurations. Additionally, the i-ED coil features a unique electronic detachment mechanism that provides auditory and visual cues at the detachment point, enabling its use with single-marker microcatheters, as demonstrated in Supplementary Video 3. This procedure is not feasible with conventional coils due to issues with the diameter and detachment system, which potentially requires 2 markers at the tip of microcatheters. Nevertheless, there were some technical issues. Excessive tortuosity of peripheral vessels in vivo could impede smooth coil insertion, potentially leading to microcatheter kickback and procedural difficulties. Therefore, we recommend selecting small and short coils (e.g., 1 cm or 2 cm in diameter). The development of this i-ED coil compatible with super-micro catheters would significantly broaden the scope of endovascular treatment techniques for highflow shunt diseases as arteriovenous malformations or fistula lesions, offering easier modulation of high blood flow before liquid embolization with agents like ONYX (Medtronic) or NBCA.
Due to the limitations associated with quantitatively assessing collateral circulation in cases with subarachnoid hemorrhage, the risk of peripheral cerebellar infarction following PAO needs to be considered. While the clinical symptoms of partial cerebellar infarction often improve with rehabilitation, occlusion proximal to perforating branches of the brainstem carries a higher risk of brainstem infarction and its associated permanent neurological deficits [2,4-6,10,11,13]. Therefore, a careful assessment using a detailed analysis of collaterals with angiography and the occlusion, including the culprit aneurysm with the preservation of perforating arteries or cortical branches, is crucial for selecting the optimal treatment of choice for each individual patient.

CONCLUSION

In cases with sufficient collateral circulation, PAO has the potential to treat peripheral aneurysms in the posterior fossa. Super-small bore microcatheters with high peripheral accessibility and i-ED coils are compatible for this procedure.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials related to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2025.00521.

Supplementary Video 1.

Case 2. The videoclip shows procedures performed, including microcatheter guidance to the peripheral anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) beyond the multiple vessel bends, and parent artery occlusion using coils at 4× regular speed. The combination of the Carry Slim Leon 1.5Fr and 2.4Fr (UTM) makes it possible to guide the catheter close to the aneurysm. Final angiogram shows occlusion of the AICA and the aneurysm.

Supplementary Video 2.

Case 3. The videoclip shows procedures performed, including microcatheter guidance beyond the vertebrobasilar junction, guiding the catheter to the peripheral posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), and coil embolization at 4× regular speed. Although there are multiple vessel bends, it is possible to guide the flow-guided microcatheter close to the aneurysm. Due to the kickback during the coil insertion, dine manipulation of the microcatheter and coil insertion are required. Final angiogram shows occlusion of the peripheral PICA and aneurysm.

Supplementary Video 3.

The videoclip shows the possibility of coil insertion of an i-ED coil complex SilkySoft 1 mm×2 cm (Kaneka) into flexible super-small bore microcatheters (Carry Slim Leon selective [UTM], DeFrictor Bull [Medico’s Hirata], and Marathon [Medtronic]). The i-ED Coil Detachment System provides sound and light to indicate the appropriate timing to detach.

Notes

Fund

None.

Ethics Statement

The Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital approved this study (Identifier is: 06-6-37). As specific patient information such as age or sex is not included, informed consent for publication was waived.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: TM. Analysis and interpretation: TM and HT. Data collection: HT, MH, and SO. Writing the article: HT. Critical revision of the article: TM. Final approval of the article: NH. Overall responsibility: TM.

Fig. 1.
Case 2. Parent artery occlusion for a ruptured peripheral aneurysm in the right anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA). (A) Axial computed tomography image showing subarachnoid hemorrhage with an extensive hematoma in the right cerebellar hemisphere. (B) An aneurysm was detected at the end of the AICA on digital subtraction angiography, coinciding with the site of the hematoma (arrowhead). The AICA periphery and superior cerebellar artery periphery were connected (arrow). (C) Collateral circulation was observed from the posterior communicating artery to the posterior circulation, and (D) collateral circulation was further enhanced (arrowhead) when the origin of the right AICA was occluded with a microballoon catheter (arrow). (E) Selective angiography revealed a 4.7-mm aneurysm distal to the AICA (arrowhead). (F) The Carry Slim Leon Selective 2.4 Fr (UTM) (arrow) and Carry Slim Leon Selective 1.5 Fr (arrowhead) were guided as close to the aneurysm as possible, overcoming multiple vascular bends. (G) i-ED coils (Kaneka) were placed, (H) the parent vessel was occluded, and the aneurysm disappeared (arrowhead). (I) There was no increase in the size of the hematoma or new infarctions after surgery.
neuroint-2025-00521f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Case 3. Parent artery occlusion for a ruptured peripheral aneurysm in the left anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA). (A) A ruptured aneurysm in the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) telovelotonsillar portion on 3-dimensionally digital subtraction angiography (DSA). (B) The left AICA was visualized in its periphery on DSA, suggesting collateral circulation to the PICA (arrowhead). (C) TACTICS (Technocrat) (arrow) and DeFrictor Bull (Medico’s Hirata) (arrowhead) were guided as close to the aneurysm as possible, beyond vertebrobasilar junction and overcoming multiple vascular bends. (D) Seven i-ED coils (Kaneka) were placed, resulting in the disappearance of the aneurysm (arrowhead). (E) Postoperative angiography showed blood flow from the AICA to the PICA area (arrowhead), and (F) no new cerebral infarction was observed.
neuroint-2025-00521f2.jpg
Table 1.
Patient series
Patient Location (segment) Initial grade (H&H) Aneurysm size (mm) Parental artery diameter (mm) Microcatheter Procedural complication Ischemic lesion after PAO mRS
1 PICA (cortical) 4 1.9 1.7 DeFrictor Bull (Medico’s Hirata) None Cerebellar cortex 2
2 AICA (cortical) 2 4.7 1.1 Carry Slim Leon (UTM) None None 0
3 PICA (telovelotonsillar) 2 4.5 1.2 DeFrictor Bull None None 0
4 PICA (lateral medullary) 3 2.4 1.1 DeFrictor Bull None None 4

H&H, Hunt and Hess grading; PAO, parent artery occlusion; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; PICA, posterior inferior cerebellar artery; AICA, anterior inferior cerebellar artery.

REFERENCES

1. Bonda DJ, Labib M, Katz JM, Ortiz RA, Chalif D, Setton A, et al. Intracranial bypass of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: indications, technical aspects, and clinical outcomes. Oper Neurosurg 2017;13:586-595.
crossref pmid pdf
2. Abla AA, McDougall CM, Breshears JD, Lawton MT. Intracranial-to-intracranial bypass for posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: options, technical challenges, and results in 35 patients. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1275-1286.
crossref pmid
3. Metayer T, Emery E, Ismail M, Gaberel T. Vertebral artery dissection associated with PICA aneurysm: PICA-PICA bypass technique. Neurochirurgie 2019;65:427-429.
crossref pmid
4. Hou K, Lv X, Guo Y, Yu J. Endovascular treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery trunk aneurysm. Acta Neurol Belg 2022;122:1405-1417.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Shin HS, Lee SH, Koh JS. Endovascular treatment of ruptured distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm. Report of two exemplary cases and retrospective analysis of 11 cases. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014;75:343-349.
crossref pmid
6. Chen Z, Li L, Gong F, Wang W. Endovascular treatment of ruptured distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: report of 11 cases. Afr Health Sci 2014;14:89-93.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Juszkat R, Kram P, Stanisławska K, Jankowski R, Stachowska-Tomczak B, Nowak S, et al. Ten years of experience in endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:129-137.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Bhogal P, AlMatter M, Hellstern V, Bäzner H, Ganslandt O, Henkes H, et al. High-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas: use of Kaneka ED coils with the marathon microcatheter for transvenous coil embolization. Clin Neuroradiol 2019;29:653-660.
crossref pmid pdf
9. Chau Y, Sachet M, Sédat J. Super-selective coil embolization of a basilar perforator artery aneurysm previously treated by the stent-in-stent technique, using an extremely soft bare coil delivered through a one-marker microcatheter. Interv Neuroradiol 2017;23:492-496.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Ghali MGZ, Zhang YJ, Kan P, Britz GW. Posteroinferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: influence of angioanatomy on the safety of flow diversion treatment. Asian J Neurosurg 2019;14:1063-1067.
crossref pmid pmc
11. van den Berg R, Doorschodt TC, Sprengers ME, Vandertop WP. Treatment of dissecting aneurysms of the PICA: anatomical considerations and clinical outcome. J Neuroradiol 2015;42:291-297.
crossref pmid
12. Matsushige T, Sakamoto S, Ishii D, Shinagawa K, Shimonaga K, Hosogai M, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new outreach distal access catheter, TACTICS, for coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2018;24:482-488.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Bacigaluppi S, Bergui M, Crobeddu E, Garbossa D, Ducati A, Fontanella M. Aneurysms of the medullary segments of the posterior-inferior cerebellar artery: considerations on treatment strategy and clinical outcome. Neurol Sci 2013;34:529-536.
crossref pmid pdf
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •    
  • 3,460 View
  • 85 Download


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
#705-2C, 9 Gangnam-ro, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 16977, KOREA
Tel: +82-31-994-4382    Fax: +82-2-2275-9198    E-mail: editor@neurointervention.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next