Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Hematologic Disorders

Article information

Neurointervention. 2025;20(3):140-149
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 October 28
doi : https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2025.00752
Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
Correspondence to: Timothy G White, MD Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 805 Northern Blvd, Suite 100, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA Tel: +(516) 550-2100 Fax: +(516) 550-2191 E-mail: twhite7@northwell.edu
Received 2025 September 1; Revised 2025 October 19; Accepted 2025 October 19.

Abstract

Purpose

Flow diverting stents are a mainstay treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IA). They rely on reduction of intra-aneurysmal blood flow velocity along with endothelialization to induce thrombus formation and promote occlusion. Patients with hematologic disorders (HDs) can have abnormal fluid dynamics and blood cell/metal interactions that can affect the mechanism of action of flow diversion (FD). We sought to determine the outcomes of patients with various HD after receiving FD treatment for IA.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective chart review examined 11 patients with various HD who received FD for their IAs. HD were classified as either coagulopathies (e.g., factor deficiencies, von Willebrand disease) or hemoglobinopathies (e.g., sickle cell disease [SCD]). Patient outcomes were assessed clinically and radiographically, with radiographic outcomes based on O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM) scores from follow-up angiograms.

Results

The total sample included 11 patients with 29 IAs. The median age was 50 years and 81.8% were female. All patients were on pre-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy. Out of the 29 total aneurysms, 17 were treated with FD and 15 originated from the paraophthalmic segment. Seven patients received surface modified stents. The median number of deployed stents during initial treatment was 2. The average aneurysm diameter was 5.03 mm (standard deviation: 3.88 mm). Patients with SCD were the only group to experience complications, with 2 out of 3 patients suffering a post-operative stroke. Seven patients with 8 treated aneurysms experienced complete occlusion at last follow-up with a mean time to OKMD score of 16.8 months.

Conclusion

Despite a small sample size, this series raises concern for the use of FD in patients with SCD. While FD still resulted in adequate rates of aneurysm occlusion, treatment methodology must be tailored for patients with HD.

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IA) has evolved dramatically over the past few decades, driven by advancements in both microvascular surgical technique and neuroendovascular technologies. Particularly notable is the development and adoption of endovascular flow diversion (FD) devices including the PipelineTM Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic Neurovascular) and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FREDTM; MicroVention), along with their surface-modified counterparts, enabling the safe and effective treatment of select aneurysms previously morphologically unfavorable for endovascular treatment [1,2]. Despite these technological advances, however, selecting which patient populations are likely to benefit from FD compared to other surgical and endovascular approaches is still an area under active investigation [1,3].

The efficacy of FD technology relies primarily on its effects on intracranial hemodynamics: the FD pores modulate inflow and outflow, promoting intra-aneurysmal stasis, thrombosis, and eventual endothelialization across the neck, thereby excluding the aneurysm from the circulation [1,3]. However, these fluid dynamics have been studied in the context of standardized experimental vasculature models and normal blood composition. It has been well established that patients with some hematologic disorders (HD) have abnormal erythrocyte-endothelial cell interactions [4], and computational fluid dynamics models have demonstrated significant alterations in cerebrovascular viscosities, shear stress, and flow velocities in patients with HD such as sickle cell disease (SCD) [5,6]. These pathophysiological differences raise concerns regarding the efficacy of FD in patients with HD. Despite these considerations, only a single case report has been published investigating FD in patients with HD [7]. The safety and efficacy of FD in patients with HD thus remains largely unexplored.

In this single institution retrospective case series, the authors present the clinical outcomes of patients with HD and IA treated with FD. The study aims to assess the periprocedural risks associated with intraluminal metal implants and evaluate the efficacy of FD in this unique patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 11 patients with various HDs who received a flow diverting stent within the last 6 years. HDs were defined as those that cause alteration to hemoglobin (e.g., SCD, sickle cell trait [SCT], alpha-thalassemia trait) and coagulation (e.g., von Willebrand disease [vWD], factor deficiencies, thrombocythemia).

Collected data included demographics, aneurysm location, aneurysm number, aneurysm morphology, and type of stent placed. Outcomes of patients were divided into clinical and aneurysm outcomes. Negative clinical outcomes were defined as any severe neurological deficits that occurred to the patient post-operatively before hospital discharge, including stroke, which was defined as either a clinical or subclinical radiologic change. Aneurysm outcomes were confirmed by O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM) scores at the time of their most recent follow-up angiogram. Aneurysm size was classified based on the criteria set forth in the Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study of Japan (UCAS Japan) study: aneurysms were classified as small if their diameter was less than 5 mm, medium if their diameter was between 5 mm and 10 mm, and large if their diameter was between 10 mm and 25 mm [8].

RESULTS

Demographics

In total, 11 patients with 29 total aneurysms were treated at a single institution (Table 1). The median age at time of treatment was 50 years (interquartile range: 41–56). Of all patients, 81.8% (n=9) were female sex. Pre-operatively, all patients were on antiplatelet regimens. One patient with Factor V Leiden was on both anticoagulation and dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). Most patients were on preoperative DAPT using aspirin and either ticagrelor or clopidogrel. One patient was on single antiplatelet therapy at the recommendation of their hematologist. Six patients had pre-operative aspirin response unit (ARU) values and 10 had pre-operative VerifyNow P2Y12 response unit (PRU) values. The mean ARU was 505 (range: 379–652) and mean PRU was 112 (range: 7–213), both considered therapeutic at our institution. Two patients had a family history of aneurysms, and 4 patients had a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). All the patients who presented with a SAH initially had their aneurysm treated with coiling, and 2 of these patients had SCD. In our total sample of 11 patients, 3 had SCD, 2 had SCT, 1 had alpha-thalassemia trait, and 5 had various coagulopathies.

Demographics of analytic sample

Aneurysms

Out of the 29 total aneurysms, 17 were treated with FD. Of the 17 treated with FD, 15 were paraophthalmic (88.2%), 1 was anterior communicating (ACOM), and 1 was anterior choroidal (Table 2). The aneurysms were treated with Pipeline Flex (n=10, 50.0%), Pipeline Flex Shield (n=7, 35.0%), and FRED X (n=3, 15.0%) with multiple adjacent aneurysms often getting treated by multiple FD in a telescoping fashion. One patient had their aneurysm treated previously with coils and was later treated with FD and more coils. One patient had their aneurysm treated only with coils and FD concurrently. The median number of FD initially deployed were 2. The average diameter of the aneurysms treated with FD was 5.03 mm (standard deviation: 3.88 mm).

Aneurysm and treatment characteristics

Outcomes

Patients with SCD (n=3) had the largest number of aneurysms per patient with 12 total aneurysms (41.4%, Table 2). Patients with SCD were also the only group in our cohort to experience adverse outcomes post-operatively after receiving FD (Table 3). Two of the 3 patients with SCD experienced a stroke post-operatively (Fig. 1). One patient had multiple ischemic strokes undergoing hemorrhagic conversion and permanent neurological deficits. The other patient had transient aphasia and homonymous hemianopsia that resolved prior to discharge. One of the 11 patients had a distinct FD treatment of a different aneurysm and was included as 2 separate treatments to make a total of 12. Three patients did not receive any follow-up angiograms after their procedure. Of those that did, 7 patients with 8 treated aneurysms had complete occlusion (OKM score C or D), whereas 2 patients with 2 treated aneurysms had adequate occlusion (OKM score B). Furthermore, the average time to OKM score D was 16.8 months or 1.4 years with the longest taking 5 years post-operatively. Three patients had inadequate occlusion on follow-up and underwent additional stent placement on a later date (Fig. 2), which occurred an average of 7.7 months from initial treatment.

Patient breakdown and HDs outcomes

Fig. 1.

Left supraclinoid aneurysms treated with flow diverters in sickle cell disease patient with post-procedural stroke. (A) 3D reconstruction of the aneurysms. (B) Angiography working angle demonstrating the multiple aneurysms. (C) Post-flow diverter placement working angle. (D) 3D reconstruction of the flow diverter post-stenting. (E, F) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating the post-procedural ischemic stroke, which eventually underwent hemorrhagic conversion and lead to the patient having permanent neurological deficits.

Fig. 2.

Left superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm requiring additional flow diverting stents placement. The patient had a left superior hypophyseal aneurysm with inadequate O’Kelly-Marotta grading scale scores on follow-up angiograms necessitating placement of additional flow diverting stents. (A) 3D reconstruction of the aneurysm. (B) Angiography working angle demonstrating the aneurysm. (C) 3D reconstruction of the flow diverter post-stenting. (D) Angiography of follow-up residual aneurysm. (E) Angiography demonstrating resolution of the left superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the role of FD in multiple patients with various HDs. Previous studies have been limited to a single patient without comparative post-operative outcomes [7]. As FD technology continues to rapidly evolve and become the mainstay treatment for a wide range of IA [9], it remains essential to assess its safety and utility in all patient populations. Patients with HDs represent a unique subset due to the alterations in blood viscosity and coagulation that may impact FD performance.

Sickle Cell Disease and Sickle Cell Trait

SCD is associated with a higher prevalence of IA often leading to SAH [10,11]. While the exact risk of aneurysm rupture in SCD is unclear, studies have reported that patients tend to present with rupture at a younger age and with smaller aneurysms compared to the general population [12]. Prior reports estimate that 6% of adults and 4% of children with SCD develop IA at some point within their lifetime [13] with 1 study showing that 52.6% of these patients had multiple aneurysms [10]. Therefore, identifying effective treatment strategies for this population is critical.

SCD arises from a beta-globin gene mutation leading to the polymerization of HbS, resulting in erythrocytes taking on a characteristic “sickle” shape, hemolysis, and increased blood viscosity [14]. This contributes to the high rates of stroke and sickle cell crises [15]. Therefore, SCD is a very common cause of stroke and consequent hemorrhage in children and adults [16,17]. Given the concern for thrombosis associated with endovascular procedures involving FD, microsurgical clipping has historically been favored for aneurysm treatment in patients with SCD [18]. In our subset of patients, Pipeline Flex Shield, Pipeline Flex, and FRED X were used in various combinations in patients with SCD and SCT. While patients with SCT did not suffer any adverse events, 2 out of the 3 patients with SCD in this series experienced ischemic strokes following FD placement. It is important to note that one of these patients also had concomitant antiphospholipid syndrome.

To our knowledge, there are only 2 reports that have described the use of FD in SCD [7,18]. Dmytriw et al. [7] demonstrated the use of a Pipeline device in treating a ruptured dissecting, fusiform aneurysm without complications. Gallas et al. [18] reported a delayed right hemispheric hemorrhage following FD for an ophthalmic artery aneurysm, which led to mortality. Additionally, Ediriwickrema et al. [19] described a case utilizing a Neuroform 3 (Boston Scientific) stent in a patient with SCD with a single aneurysm. In our study, all patients with SCD had multiple aneurysms and 2 had a history of SAH previously treated with endovascular coiling. These 2 patients were the only in our cohort experiencing adverse clinical outcomes after FD treatment, with both experiencing a stroke. One patient had multiple and progressive ischemic strokes that underwent hemorrhagic conversion and experienced significant permanent neurological deficits. The other patient had transient aphasia and homonymous hemianopsia that resolved prior to discharge. Of note, for both patients, the aneurysms treated with FD were separate from the previously coiled aneurysms. Both patients also received multiple flow diverting stents in a telescoping fashion to treat their aneurysms. While the literature has not suggested that multiple flow diverting stents increase the risk for stroke, there is a paucity in the literature on their safety in patients with HDs.

Prior literature has demonstrated high rates of aneurysm occlusion via FD at 6 months, with studies reporting the average time to aneurysm occlusion as 6.92 months to 14.7 months and complete occlusion rates of 73% to 95.6% [20,21]. However, in our cohort, the occlusion rates were lower, with the average time to OKM score of D of 16.8 months and only 33.3% occlusion at 6 months. Two patients still had not reached adequate occlusion at the time of last follow-up (OKM score B). Specifically, among patients with SCD, the average occlusion time was 8 months, though 1 aneurysm remained patent at 2 years. The prolonged time to aneurysm occlusion is likely due to impaired endothelialization, as SCD has been found to be associated with endothelial dysfunction due to decreased endogenous nitric oxide and decreased endothelial progenitor cells [22,23]. These mechanisms disrupt the functionality of FD, thereby decreasing the ability of the aneurysm to occlude.

FD have become the treatment of choice for many IA due to their low risk profile and high efficacy shown in multiple prospective trials. While surgical clipping has been traditionally performed in SCD patients, prolonged anesthesia times poses risks of vaso-occlusive crises [24]. Furthermore, patients with repeated episodes of acute chest syndrome can have decreased pulmonary function [25], which can lead to perioperative hypoxia and therefore may predispose patients to recurrent vaso-occlusive events during surgery [24]. Given the drawbacks of open surgery, many authors have pursued endovascular treatment of aneurysms in patients with SCD. Endovascular procedures offer shorter procedure times and therefore less anesthesia, decreasing the risk for vaso-occlusive crises. In addition, patients with SCD often have multiple aneurysms [10], therefore a FD can potentially treat all adjacent aneurysms at once, reducing the need for multiple operations. However, our findings suggest that there may be significant stroke risks involved with the placement of intraluminal metal. Therefore, the optimal treatment of patients with SCD is unclear, but endovascular coiling may represent a safer alternative in some cases by offering the advantages of shorter procedure times without the need for intraluminal metal.

Alpha-Thalassemia Trait and Coagulopathies

This study is the first to report on the efficacy of FD in patients with alpha-thalassemia trait and various coagulopathies such as thrombocythemia. Alpha-thalassemia trait, also called alpha-thalassemia minor, involves the deletion of 2 alpha-globin genes, which results in a mild anemia. In our cohort, the 1 patient with alpha-thalassemia trait achieved complete occlusion of the aneurysm within 6 months.

Thrombocythemia is a myeloproliferative disorder consisting of the overproduction of platelets [26]. It is also associated with an increase in thrombosis which decreases available platelets to prevent excessive bleeding [26], and can lead to hemorrhagic events or occlusion of vessels by causing a prothrombotic state [27]. There have been a few reports in the literature of patients with thrombocythemia developing aneurysms, both extracranially [28] and intracranially [27]. Baek and Kim [27] report a case of a patient with thrombocythemia treated endovascularly with coils leading to an infarction but overall recovery of neurological deficits. Our sample included 2 patients with thrombocythemia. One patient lacked follow-up imaging while the other had inadequate occlusion of the aneurysm and required additional FD placement. The delayed occlusion may be attributed to dysfunctional platelet aggregation exacerbated by DAPT, which may limit intra-aneurysmal thrombus formation and endothelization of the vessel wall [29]. Future research is needed to understand the flow dynamics in this subset of patients. However, it is important to note that neither patient had a complication or thrombosis associated with placement of the FD.

This study also analyzed patients with Protein S deficiency, Factor V Leiden, and vWD with Factor XII deficiency. Each of these factors plays an important role in the coagulation cascade in the formation or breakdown of clots. Protein S is a co-factor for Protein C and physiologically causes the degradation of clotting factors Va and VIIIa, however its deficiency causes a hypercoagulable state. The increased production of clots and decreased breakdown of certain clotting factors can cause occlusion of the vessels and an increased risk of stroke [30]. Our patient with Protein S deficiency had to receive additional flow diverting stents due to inadequate occlusion of the aneurysm and required 5 years to complete aneurysm occlusion. Brouns et al. [31] reported that Protein S deficiency causes impairment of fibrin formation and platelet activation, which are crucial for aneurysm occlusion [32]. Factor V Leiden also causes a hypercoagulable state by decreasing the ability of Factor Va from being degraded by Protein C. There is debate in the literature regarding Factor V Leiden and IA risk, with some studies reporting an association between these conditions [33] as well as an increased risk for stroke [34]. Our patient was placed on both anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents prior to FD placement to decrease the risk of thromboembolic events. The patient did not experience any post-operative adverse events in the hospital; however, this patient did not receive any post-operative angiograms.

Finally, vWD is a deficiency of von Willebrand factor (vWF) which is involved in both the coagulation cascade and platelet plug formation. For the coagulation cascade, it is a carrier protein for Factor VIII, and vWF also plays a role in ensuring platelet adherence to the endothelial lining. For FD, platelet adherence to the vessel wall is crucial for formation of new intima and occlusion of the aneurysm. This patient also had Factor XII deficiency which also causes a decrease in coagulation. Due to the pathophysiology of these two conditions, it is not surprising that this patient needed to be re-treated due to inadequate aneurysm occlusion.

None of the patients with coagulopathies experienced any adverse effects from the use of FD; however, 2 of the patients had inadequate occlusion at the time of last follow-up angiogram. The patient with thrombocythemia received an OKM score of B at the most recent follow-up 6 months post-operatively and required an additional FD. The patient with Protein S deficiency also required an additional FD and had an OKM score of C at last follow-up 1 year after the initial FD placement and 6 months after the additional FD placement. Finally, our patient with vWD and Factor XII deficiency had multiple additional stents placed with a time to complete aneurysm occlusion (OKM score D) of 5 years.

While our patient with vWD did not have any adverse events, it is important to note the increased risk of hemorrhage in patients with vWD on DAPT [35]. Our patient had a time to complete occlusion of 5 years with additional FDs placed, necessitating a prolonged course of DAPT. While it can be effective in the short term, studies have shown that prolonged use can increase the risk of severe hemorrhage and must be used with caution in this population. Therefore, while FD can be a good treatment option, its necessity for the prolonged use of DAPT may limit its utility in this population and a discussion with the patient should be had about any potential risks.

Limitations

Our sample includes a small cohort of 11 patients and few patients with each individual HD. All HD besides SCD, SCT, and thrombocythemia had only 1 patient, making this study unable to be generalizable. Furthermore, not all patients received follow-up angiograms, therefore we were unable to fully assess the post-operative occlusion times in all patients across the various HD. While this is a small series, there is a paucity of literature on the topic of FD in HD, limiting ability for comparison. Our experience was one of a single-center, and therefore it is important to compare whether our experience is similar to those of other institutions with varying patient populations and protocols.

CONCLUSION

Despite a small sample size, this series raises concerns regarding the use of flow diverters in patients with HDs, especially in SCD. There is potentially an increased risk for periprocedural complications in these patients, as well as longer times to aneurysm occlusion as shown by lower OKM scores at last follow-up. Further studies are needed to determine a safe management plan that helps reduce complications in this population.

Notes

Fund

None.

Ethics Statement

This retrospective case series was conducted with approval in Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Northwell Health (IRB no. 23-0715) and a waiver of patient consent. Patient information that could identify an individual was anonymized.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: IP. Analysis and interpretation: IP, CW, and TGW. Data collection: IP, JBB, and CW. Writing the article: IP, CW, and DGL. Critical revision of the article: all authors. Final approval of the article: all authors. Statistical analysis: IP. Obtained funding: none. Overall responsibility: TGW.

References

1. Enriquez-Marulanda A, Young MM, Taussky P. Flow diversion: a disruptive technology coming of age. Lessons learned and challenges for the future. J Neurosurg 2023;139:1317–1327.
2. Waqas M, Dossani RH, Alkhaldi M, Neveu J, Cappuzzo JM, Lim J, et al. Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:347–357.
3. Lee KS, Zhang JJY, Nguyen V, Han J, Johnson JN, Kirollos R, et al. The evolution of intracranial aneurysm treatment techniques and future directions. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45:1–25.
4. Smith BD, La Celle PL. Erythrocyte-endothelial cell adherence in sickle cell disorders. Blood 1986;68:1050–1054.
5. Rivera CP, Veneziani A, Ware RE, Platt MO. Original research: Sickle cell anemia and pediatric strokes: computational fluid dynamics analysis in the middle cerebral artery. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2016;241:755–765.
6. Keller SB, Bumpus JM, Gatenby JC, Yang E, Kassim AA, Dampier C, et al. Characterizing intracranial hemodynamics in sickle cell anemia: impact of patient-specific viscosity. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2022;13:104–119.
7. Dmytriw AA, Martinez JL, Marotta T, Montanera W, Cusimano M, Bharatha A. Use of a flow-diverting stent for ruptured dissecting aneurysm treatment in a patient with sickle cell disease. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:143–147.
8. Merritt WC, Berns HF, Ducruet AF, Becker TA. Definitions of intracranial aneurysm size and morphology: a call for standardization. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:506.
9. Vivanco-Suarez J, Flores JEB, Rodriguez-Calienes A, Miranda JC, Foa G, Altschul D, et al. Flow diverter performance for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: an international multicenter comparative study. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol 2023;3e000696.
10. Nabavizadeh SA, Vossough A, Ichord RN, Kwiatkowski J, Pukenas BA, Smith MJ, et al. Intracranial aneurysms in sickle cell anemia: clinical and imaging findings. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:434–440.
11. Birkeland P, Gardner K, Kesse-Adu R, Davies J, Lauritsen J, Rom Poulsen F, et al. Intracranial aneurysms in sickle-cell disease are associated with the hemoglobin SS genotype but not with moyamoya syndrome. Stroke 2016;47:1710–1713.
12. Wang Y, Garland JS, Fellah S, Reis MN, Parsons MS, Guilliams KP, et al. Intracranial aneurysms in sickle cell disease are associated with hemodynamic stress and anemia. Blood Adv 2024;8:4823–4831.
13. Mallon D, Doig D, Dixon L, Gontsarova A, Jan W, Tona F. Neuroimaging in sickle cell disease: a review. J Neuroimaging 2020;30:725–735.
14. Sundd P, Gladwin MT, Novelli EM. Pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2019;14:263–292.
15. Zedde M, Quaresima M, Capodanno I, Grisendi I, Assenza F, Napoli M, et al. Neurovascular manifestations of sickle cell disease. Hemato 2024;5:277–320.
16. Switzer JA, Hess DC, Nichols FT, Adams RJ. Pathophysiology and treatment of stroke in sickle-cell disease: present and future. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:501–512.
17. Runge A, Brazel D, Pakbaz Z. Stroke in sickle cell disease and the promise of recent disease modifying agents. J Neurol Sci 2022;442:120412.
18. Gallas S, Tuilier T, Ebrahiminia V, Bartolucci P, Hodel J, Gaston A. Intracranial aneurysms in sickle cell disease: aneurysms characteristics and modalities of endovascular approach to treat these patients. J Neuroradiol 2020;47:221–226.
19. Ediriwickrema A, Williamson T, Hebert R, Matouk C, Johnson MH, Bulsara KR. Intracranial stenting as monotherapy in subarachnoid hemorrhage and sickle cell disease. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5e4.
20. Jee TK, Yeon JY, Kim KH, Kim JS, Jeon P. Flow diversion for cerebral aneurysms: a decade-long experience with improved outcomes and predictors of success. Brain Sci 2024;14:847.
21. Narata AP, Obradó L, Moyano RK, Macho JM, Blasco J, Rueda AL, et al. Cerebral aneurysm occlusion at 12-month follow-up after flow-diverter treatment: statistical modeling for V&V with real-world data. Front Med Technol 2021;3:705003.
22. Morris CR. Mechanisms of vasculopathy in sickle cell disease and thalassemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2008;2008:177–185.
23. Anjum F, Lazar J, Zein J, Jamaleddine G, Demetis S, Wadgaonkar R. Characterization of altered patterns of endothelial progenitor cells in sickle cell disease related pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Circ 2012;2:54–60.
24. Azbell RCG, Lanzkron SM, Desai PC. Current evidence and rationale to guide perioperative management, including transfusion decisions, in patients with sickle cell disease. Anesth Analg 2023;136:1107–1114.
25. De A, Williams S, Yao Y, Jin Z, Brittenham GM, Kattan M, et al. Acute chest syndrome, airway inflammation and lung function in sickle cell disease. PLoS One 2023;18e0283349.
26. Tefferi A, Pardanani A. Essential thrombocythemia. N Engl J Med 2019;381:2135–2144.
27. Baek JW, Kim YD. Cerebral dissecting aneurysms in patients with essential thrombocythemia. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2014;56:257–260.
28. Yamamoto N, Onoda K. Abdominal aortic aneurysm with essential thrombocythemia: a case report describing perioperative management in open surgery. Ann Vasc Dis 2023;16:150–153.
29. Ravindran K, Casabella AM, Cebral J, Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Kadirvel R. Mechanism of action and biology of flow diverters in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2020;86(Suppl 1):S13–S19.
30. Hooda A, Khandelwal PD, Saxena P. Protein S deficiency: recurrent ischemic stroke in young. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2009;12:183–184.
31. Brouns SLN, Tullemans BME, Bulato C, Perrella G, Campello E, Spiezia L, et al. Protein C or Protein S deficiency associates with paradoxically impaired platelet-dependent thrombus and fibrin formation under flow. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2022;6e12678.
32. Sarrami-Foroushani A, Lassila T, Hejazi SM, Nagaraja S, Bacon A, Frangi AF. A computational model for prediction of clot platelet content in flow-diverted intracranial aneurysms. J Biomech 2019;91:7–13.
33. Andreou A, Papapetrou C, Papadimitriou K, Avgoustidis D, Yapijakis C. Cerebrovascular aneurysms may be associated with thrombophilia-predisposing mutations in patients with familial risk. In Vivo 2015;29:395–398.
34. Lüdemann P, Nabavi DG, Junker R, Wolff E, Papke K, Buchner H, et al. Factor V Leiden mutation is a risk factor for cerebral venous thrombosis: a case-control study of 55 patients. Stroke 1998;29:2507–2510.
35. Leiva O, Connors JM, Connell NT, Berger JS. Acute myocardial infarction in von Willebrand disease: characteristics and outcomes. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2023;7:102198.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Left supraclinoid aneurysms treated with flow diverters in sickle cell disease patient with post-procedural stroke. (A) 3D reconstruction of the aneurysms. (B) Angiography working angle demonstrating the multiple aneurysms. (C) Post-flow diverter placement working angle. (D) 3D reconstruction of the flow diverter post-stenting. (E, F) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating the post-procedural ischemic stroke, which eventually underwent hemorrhagic conversion and lead to the patient having permanent neurological deficits.

Fig. 2.

Left superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm requiring additional flow diverting stents placement. The patient had a left superior hypophyseal aneurysm with inadequate O’Kelly-Marotta grading scale scores on follow-up angiograms necessitating placement of additional flow diverting stents. (A) 3D reconstruction of the aneurysm. (B) Angiography working angle demonstrating the aneurysm. (C) 3D reconstruction of the flow diverter post-stenting. (D) Angiography of follow-up residual aneurysm. (E) Angiography demonstrating resolution of the left superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm.

Table 1.

Demographics of analytic sample

Demographic Total sample (n=11)
Age (y) 50 [41-56]
Sex, female 9 (81.8)
Race
 Black 8 (72.7)
 White 2 (18.2)
BMI (kg/m2) 24.16±5.77
Family history of aneurysms 3 (27.3)
Hypertension 4 (36.4)
Hyperlipidemia 2 (18.2)
Smoking 2 (18.2)
History of SAH 4 (36.4)
Preoperative levels
 Platelet levels 330.27±160.78
 ARU 504.83±114.10
 PRU 112.91±62.27
 Anticoagulant use 1 (9.1) [Factor V Leiden]
 Antiplatelet use 11 (100.0)
HD
 SCD 3 (27.3)
 SCT 2 (18.2)
 Other (e.g., alpha-thalassemia trait, Protein S deficiency, thrombocythemia, vWD, Factor XII deficiency, Factor V Leiden) 6 (54.5)

Values are presented as median [interquartile range], number (%), or mean±standard deviation.

BMI, body mass index; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; ARU, aspirin response unit; PRU, P2Y12 response unit; HD, hematologic disorder; SCD, sickle cell disease; SCT, sickle cell trait; vWD, von Willebrand disease.

Table 2.

Aneurysm and treatment characteristics

Total aneurysms (n=29) FD (n=17) Retreatments (n=3)
Aneurysm laterality
 Right 16 (55.2) 7 (41.2) 1 (33.3)
Aneurysm location
 Paraophthalmic 19 (65.5) 15 (88.2) 2 (66.7)
 A1-A2 junction 1 (3.4) 1 (5.9) 1 (33.3)
 Anterior choroidal 1 (3.4) 1 (5.9) 0 (0)
 Basilar tip 1 (3.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Cavernous 1 (3.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 ICA terminus 3 (10.3) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Posterior communicating 1 (3.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Superior cerebellar 1 (3.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Aneurysm size
 Small ( <5 mm) 20 (69.0) 12 (70.6) 1 (33.3)
 Medium (5-10 mm) 5 (17.2) 3 (17.6) 1 (33.3)
 Large (11-25 mm) 2 (6.9) 2 (11.8) 1 (33.3)
Flow diverter type (n=28)
 Pipeline Flex 13 (46.4) 10 (50.0) 3 (37.5)
 Pipeline Shield 11 (39.3) 7 (35.0) 4 (50.0)
 FRED X 4 (14.3) 3 (15.0) 1 (12.5)
Coils with flow diverter 2 (6.9) - -
HD
 SCD (n=3) 12 (41.4) 7 (41.2) 0 (0)
 SCT (n=2) 3 (10.3) 2 (11.8) 0 (0)

Multiple aneurysms were treated with flow diverting stents and an adjunct treatment such as coiling. Some of the total aneurysms were not treated. A few patients needed to have their aneurysms treated with an additional stent.

FD, flow diversion; ICA, internal carotid artery; FRED X, Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device X; -, not applicable; HD, hematologic disorder; SCD, sickle cell disease; SCT, sickle cell trait.

Table 3.

Patient breakdown and HDs outcomes

ID HDs Total aneurysms Aneurysms treated with FD Type of FD Re-stented OKM immediately after FD mRS pre-FD OKM at last follow-up Last follow-up angiogram mRS at last follow-up Adverse outcome
1 SCD and antiphospholipid syndrome 6 3 2 (PS, FX) No D 2 N/A N/A 3 Stroke with hemorrhagic conversion
2 SCT 2 1 2 (PS, FX) No 2A 0 D 1 year 0 N/A
3 Alpha-thalassemia trait 1 1 2 (PS, FX) No 2A 1 D 6 months 0 N/A
4 vWD and Factor XII deficiency 2 1 2 (PF) Yes 2A 0 D 5 years 1 N/A
5 Factor V Leiden 6 3 2 (PS) No D 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A
6 Protein S deficiency 2 1 1 (PS) Yes 2A 0 C 1 year 0 N/A
7 Thrombocythemia 2 1 1 (PS) No 2A 0 N/A N/A 1 N/A
8 Thrombocythemia 1 1 1 (PS) Yes 3A 1 B 6 months 0 N/A
9 SCT 1 1 2 (PF) No D 1 D 7 months 1 N/A
10 SCD 4 2 [L], 1 [R] 2 (PF) [L], 2 (PF) [R] No 3A 1[L], 1[R] D [L], B [R] 10 months [L], 2 years [R] 1 [L], 1 [R] Stroke
11 SCD 2 1 1 (PF) No 2A 0 D 6 months 0 N/A

One patient had two distinct FD treatments and are denoted by [R] and [L] for right and left, respectively.

HDs, hematologic disorders; FD, flow diversion; OKM, O’Kelly-Marotta grading scale; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; SCD, sickle cell disease; PS, Pipeline Flex Shield; FX, Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device X ; N/A, not applicable ; SCT, sickle cell trait; vWD, von Willebrand disease; PF, Pipeline Flex.