INTRODUCTION
Endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) carries different risks than EVT of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, such as for acute hydrocephalus. External ventricular drainage (EVD) is one of the most important and common emergency procedures in neurosurgery mainly used to normalize or monitor intracranial pressure (ICP) [1-3]. Increased ICP should be normalized as soon as possible. Patients with aSAH have undergone EVT, but EVD has been suggested as a potential risk factor for hemorrhagic complications [4-7]. When to perform EVD, before or after securing the ruptured aneurysm, remains controversial. EVD before EVT may increase rebleeding while EVD after EVT may delay normalizing increased ICP. Thus, the purpose of this study was to report the authors’ experience with EVD before EVT in patients with acute aSAH and to investigate its relation to hemorrhagic complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient selection
The institutional review board of our institute approved research protocols, and informed consent was waived. A prospective database contained a series of 1,393 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by microsurgery or EVT between March 2007 and December 2017. Among them, EVD was performed for 468 patients. A total of 122 patients were included in this study, and all patients met the following criteria: 1) presence of aSAH, 2) underwent EVT to secure the ruptured aneurysm within 72 hours of rupture, and 3) EVD performed within 72 hours of rupture. Three hundred forty-six patients were excluded due to the following reasons: 1) patients underwent microsurgery for securing the ruptured aneurysm (n=136); 2) patients underwent EVT more than 72 hours after rupture (n=55); 3) patients had a significant intracerebral hematoma due to the ruptured aneurysm requiring evacuation (n=42); 4) dissecting, fusiform, or blood blister-like aneurysm (n=60); 5) mycotic aneurysm (n=6); 6) traumatic pseudoaneurysm (n=9); and 7) incomplete clinical or radiographic information (n=38). The included patients were sorted into two groups: a pre-embo EVD group (n=67) comprising patients who underwent EVD before EVT and a post-embo EVD group (n=55) comprising those who underwent EVD after EVT.
Rebleeding was defined as sudden clinical deterioration with evidence of fresh blood on a computed tomography (CT) scan in comparison with a previous scan or as evidence of contrast leaking on CT angiography (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography. Thromboembolic complications were defined as angiographic evidence of thrombosis during or at the end of EVT. Hemorrhagic complications were defined as a newly developed hemorrhage on CT or magnetic resonance image within 30 days after the procedure. EVD-related hemorrhagic complication was determined by two independent investigators. Regardless of clinical symptoms, hemorrhage was considered to be EVD-related if it occurred along the ventricular catheter tract after EVD placement (Fig. 1).
External ventricular drainage and endovascular treatment
After initial CT and CTA confirmed aSAH, patients with acute hydrocephalus, intraventricular hemorrhage, or rapid deterioration of consciousness suggesting increased ICP underwent EVD. A hand drill with a 4.6-mm or 5.3-mm drill bit was used to perform EVD on Kocher’s point or the supraorbital point in patients who were intubated with artificial ventilation under analgosedation using fentanyl, midazolam, morphine, or propofol. EVD was drained intermittently, to reach an ICP of 20 cmH2O (slightly above normal ICP).
The decision to treat a ruptured aneurysm was made by agreement of microvascular neurosurgeons and neurointerventionists. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia with a standard approach from the common femoral artery. A 6- or 7-Fr guiding catheter was positioned in the internal carotid artery for anterior circulation aneurysms. A 5- or 6-Fr guiding catheter was positioned in the vertebral artery for posterior circulation aneurysms. Coils and stents were chosen according to the surgeon’s preference. Heparin was not injected intravenously or subcutaneously but was instead mixed into saline flushes during the procedure. Therefore, the activated clotting time was not checked during the procedure. When stents were used, loading doses of clopidogrel (300–600 mg) and aspirin (200–400 mg) were given via a nasogastric tube after the femoral artery puncture or deploying stents. After the procedure, patients were prescribed 75 mg clopidogrel daily for 3 months and 100 mg aspirin daily for at least 12 months. During the procedure, 1 mg of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist (tirofiban) was injected intra-arterially when the parent artery was occluded by a thromboembolism. Patients who underwent EVT without a stent did not take antiplatelet agents during or after the procedure.
Clinical and radiographic outcomes
Clinical outcomes and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively. Patient factors (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, antiplatelet regiment on admission, anticoagulant regiment on admission, initial Hunt-Hess grade, initial intracerebral hemorrhage, initial intraventricular hemorrhage, initial hydrocephalus, pre-embo rebleeding, and symptomatic vasospasm) and aneurysm characteristics (location [anterior or posterior circulation], aneurysm dome size [maximal diameter], neck size, aneurysm type [saccular or non-saccular], and stents use) were evaluated to identify risk factors for EVD-related hemorrhagic complications. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and evaluated by an independent investigator who was not involved in patient care. A favorable outcome was defined as mRS 0–2 and an unfavorable outcome was defined as mRS 3–6. The radiographic data were evaluated by two independent investigators.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) in consultation with a biostatistician. Mann-Whitney U test was used for numeric variables. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test were used for nominal variables. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the association of EVD-related hemorrhage with other factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on variables with an unadjusted effect, and a P-value less than 0.10 on univariate analysis was used to determine risk factors independently associated with EVD-related hemorrhagic complications. A P-value less than 0.05 for a 95% confidence interval (CI) was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The radiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of the 122 patients in both groups are shown in Table 1. Mean age was 56.5±12.4 years in the pre-embo EVD group and 58.8±13.3 years in the post-embo EVD group (P=0.527). Initial Hunt-Hess grade differed significantly between groups (P=0.034). The pre-embo EVD group had more patients with a poor grade. Nineteen patients (28.4%) in the pre-embo EVD group and eight (14.5%) in the post-embo EVD group had initial intracerebral hemorrhage (P=0.094). Rebleeding before EVT seemed more common in the pre-embo EVD group (28.4%) than in the post-embo EVD group (41.8%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.120). Anterior circulation aneurysms were more common than posterior circulation aneurysms. Mean aneurysm size and neck size were 6.5±1.5 and 3.1±0.9, respectively, and did not differ between groups. Overall, EVD-related hemorrhage occurred in 18 patients (14.8%): six (8.9%) in the pre-embo EVD group and 12 (21.8%) in the post-embo EVD group (P=0.065). Three patients (one in the pre-embo EVD group and two in the post-embo EVD group) had symptomatic parenchymal hemorrhage requiring surgical evacuation. The other patients had small, asymptomatic hemorrhage along the ventricular catheter tract. No rebleeding occurred between EVD and EVT in the pre-embo EVD group.
Logistic regression adjusted for age and sex showed that antiplatelet or anticoagulant use on admission (odds ratio [OR], 2.928; 95% CI, 1.234–7.439; P=0.042) and stent use (OR, 2.430; 95% CI, 1.524–7.613; P=0.047) remained independent risk factors for EVD-related hemorrhagic complications (Table 2). Aneurysm neck size, aneurysm type, and EVD timing (pre- vs. post-embo) had P-values of 0.098, 0.052, and 0.088, respectively, in a simple logistic regression but were not statistically significant after adjustment (P=0.236, 0.089, and 0.154, respectively). EVD timing (pre- vs. post-embo) was not a risk factor for EVD-related hemorrhagic complications, suggesting that pre-embo EVD did not increase EVD-related hemorrhagic complications compared to post-embo EVD.
Clinical outcomes at discharge did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.384). Overall, 32 patients (26.2%) had favorable outcomes and 90 (73.8%) had unfavorable outcomes at discharge. Clinical outcome at discharge, adjusted for age, sex, and initial Hunt-Hess grade, in patients who had pre-embo rebleeding (19 in the pre-embo EVD group and 23 in the post-embo EVD group) were better in the pre-embo EVD group than in the post-embo EVD group (P=0.041; Fig. 2).
DISCUSSION
In our small series, EVD-related hemorrhagic complications occurred in 14.8% of patients. Although EVD-related hemorrhage seemed more common in post-embo EVD (21.8%) than in pre-embo EVD (8.9%), the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.065). In addition, no rebleeding occurred due to pre-embo EVD in our series, suggesting that pre-embo EVD did not increase hemorrhagic complications, such as rebleeding or EVD-related hemorrhage. EVD-related hemorrhage rates of 15–20% have been reported in patients with aSAH [8,9]. Data regarding the risk of rebleeding after EVD in patients with an unprotected aneurysm remains conflicting. Hasan et al. [6] prospectively studied 473 patients and reported that the rebleeding rate within 12 days of aSAH was significantly higher in patients with EVD (43%) than in those without (15%, P=0.025). However, the authors did not provide information on EVD timing [6]. Paré et al. [7] reported on a cohort of 128 patients with aSAH. Patients with EVD (30%) had a higher incidence of rebleeding than those without (8%, P<0.006). A retrospective study of 304 patients with aSAH demonstrated no difference in rebleeding rates among patients with (4.4%) or without EVD (5.4%) [10]. Another study also concluded that EVD was not associated rebleeding in patients with aSAH [11]. Hellingman et al. [5] reported no difference between the incidence of rebleeding with preoperative EVD (21%) and controls (21%) in a study of 546 prospectively recruited patients with aSAH. However, previous studies did not account for time gap between EVD and aneurysm treatments. Additionally, the interval between onset of aSAH and EVD was vague. In the present study, thus, we tried to assess the safety of EVD placement before securing ruptured aneurysms in the acute period and to emphasize that controlling increased ICP is more important in such patients to improve clinical outcomes. In the same context, we found that clinical outcomes at discharge were better in the pre-embo EVD group than in the post-embo EVD group, suggesting that pre-embo EVD improved clinical outcomes by controlling ICP. Securing a ruptured aneurysm before EVD in patients with increased ICP may delay normalizing ICP and induce brain damage.
Among 468 patients who underwent EVD, pre-embo rebleeding occurred in 45 patients (9.6%). In our practice, we tend to perform EVT rather than microsurgery in patients with pre-embo rebleeding, including 42 of the 45 patients in the present study. A good initial Hunt-Hess grade was more common in the post-embo EVD group (P=0.034) than in the pre-embo EVD group because we performed one-staged coiling immediately followed by EVD if rebleeding occurred.
Patients who undergo EVT for aSAH need antiplatelet agents, anticoagulant agents, or both to prevent potential thromboembolic complications. Consequently, hemorrhagic complications can occur if patients with acute aSAH require additional surgical procedures after EVT. We identified two risk factors for EVD-related hemorrhagic complications: stent use and antiplatelet or anticoagulant use on admission. These risk factors are not surprising because physicians who treat intracranial aneurysms know that they are related to bleeding tendency. If stent use is considered to require antiplatelet use, both risk factors have same mechanism to provoke hemorrhagic complications. In our previous study of stent-assisted coil embolization in patients with acute aSAH, EVD was the only independent risk factor for periprocedural complications in a multivariate logistic regression [12]. Bruder et al. [13] analyzed the rate of EVD-related hemorrhage in patients with aSAH with or without artificial anticoagulation therapy during aneurysm treatment. EVD-related hemorrhage occurred in 12% of patients with aSAH. The rate of EVD-related hemorrhage in patients with additional anticoagulation after securing aneurysm was 24% versus 8% in patients without anticoagulation (P<0.001) [13]. In our practice, heparin was not injected intravenously or subcutaneously but was instead mixed into saline flushes during the procedure because we felt that hemorrhagic complications were more fatal than thromboembolic complications in patients with aSAH. If thromboembolism occurred during the procedure, we injected up to 1 mg of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist (tirofiban) intra-arterially.
This study has several limitations. It is a retrospective study and included a small number of patients, which lowers the power to identify the true incidence of EVD-related complications. The individual response to each antiplatelet agent was not evaluated. A study on coronary intervention suggested that 30% of patients have relative clopidogrel resistance [14]. Thus, a subset of patients probably over- or under-responded to antiplatelet agents. Comparison of clinical outcomes between groups of patients with aSAH should be adjusted for well-known predisposing or risk factors. In the present study, clinical outcomes for two groups of patients who experienced pre-embo rebleeding in Fig. 2 was adjusted for age, sex, and initial Hunt-Hess grade. However, comparison of overall clinical outcomes at discharge between groups in Table 1 was not adjusted for those factors. It might show different results if adjusted because the initial Hunt-Hess grade was significantly different between two groups. Finally, we did not assess activity of the coagulation cascade. An individual’s potential to generate thrombin may correlate closely with a hypercoagulable state, which may have supported our results. Therefore, monitoring changes in prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, or thrombin generation [15] may help predict EVD-related hemorrhagic complications.
CONCLUSION
EVD before EVT in patients with aSAH in the acute period did not increase the rate of rebleeding or EVD-related hemorrhagic complications. Thus, performing EVD before EVT may be beneficial to normalize increased ICP. Especially in patients with rebleeding before a ruptured aneurysm is secured, pre-embo EVD may improve clinical outcomes at discharge.
PDF Links
PubReader
ePub Link
XML Download
Full text via DOI
Full text via PMC
Download Citation
Print
