Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/neurointervention/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2023-06.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: Comment
Neurointervention Search

CLOSE


Neurointervention > Epub ahead of print
Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: Comment
Dear Editor,
We would like to share ideas on the publication “Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles” [1]. The author emphasizes that each editor must decide whether or not to implement these six policies for their journals [1]. Editors-publishers of society journals are encouraged to become familiar with these policies so that they can implement them in their publications as needed [1]. We all agree that the six proposed criteria are extremely useful in promoting quality improvement in journal. The goal of journal should be to follow best practices in journal publishing. However, the concept needs to be expanded to include the authors who submit articles and the readers of the “Neurointervention”. Despite several attempts by journals to eliminate the problem of misconduct, success in achieving a “misconduct free” cannot be expected without the cooperation of other parties, including authors, reviewers, readers of the journal and the academic institute/society. In our experience as an international journal, Case Study and Case Report (ISSN 2228-8988), editors in the management of academic publications, authors who engage in misconduct and violate the best ethical practices in publishing often claim that they “did not know the rules.” [2] As a result, there should be a system in place to regularly remind or communicate the important ethical practice guidelines. This could be included in the journal’s submission process as a warning sign to those submitting the article.

Notes

Fund

None.

Ethics Statement

This article does not require approval from the Institutional Review Board. Also, informed consent for publication was not required.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: AK, VW. Analysis and interpretation: AK, VW. Writing the article: AK. Final approval of the article: AK, VW.

REFERENCES

1. Huh S. Recent issues in medical journal publishing and editing policies: adoption of artificial intelligence, preprints, open peer review, model text recycling policies, best practice in scholarly publishing 4th version, and country names in titles. Neurointervention 2023;18:2-8.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Wiwanitkit S, Wiwanitkit V. Responses of authors accused of plagiarism by journal editors. Sci Eng Ethics 2017;23:309-311.
crossref pmid pdf


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
#705-2C, 9 Gangnam-ro, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 16977, KOREA
Tel: +82-31-994-4382    Fax: +82-2-2275-9198    E-mail: ksin@ksin.or.kr                

Copyright © 2023 by Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next