Reply to the Comment on Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: Comment

Sun Huh

doi:10.5469/neuroint.2023.00115

Thank you for your interest in my review article [1]. I agree that the 6 policies I have outlined need to be extended to both authors and readers for a more scientifically rigorous article preparation. By understanding these policies, especially model text recycling and best practices in scholarly publishing, authors will be better equipped to compose manuscripts that adhere to the highest ethical standards. Readers of Neurointervention will benefit from my review article, which offers valuable insights into manuscript preparation. In addition, a screening process is in place to ensure compliance with ethical guidelines before manuscript submission. This process includes a checklist that requires Institutional Review Board approval, informed consent from participants, data sharing, disclosure of conflicts of interest, and funding sources. In addition, all submitted manuscripts are now subject to mandatory plagiarism screening. The Neurointervention e-submission system already maintains this checklist and screening system. These joint efforts of the journal’s editorial office and authors will undoubtedly serve as a milestone in elevating the journal to top-tier international status.

Reply to the Comment on Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: Comment

Notes

REFERENCE